Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Many questions, few answers left in Tucson’s wake


What is government if words have no meaning?

That was the question Jared Lee Loughner posed to Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in their first meeting. In their second meeting, he shot her in the head.

The round-the-clock media circus has taken a swipe at every minute detail of Loughner's life in an attempt to understand his motivations for killing six and wounding 14 others in the attempted assassination of a congresswoman.

Unfortunately, the 24-hour-a-day speculation-based coverage of every non-development and irrelevant insight into the life of the accused has taken center-stage in a nation-wide theater production that continues to say a lot but reveal almost nothing.

Loughner has remained silent. The 250 federal officials tasked with investigating the horrific shooting have failed to deliver a motive. And so the media is left chasing its tail in an attempt to assemble a puzzle that has no pieces.

We know he's male. We know he's white. We know he was kicked out of community college for saying weird shit. Based on the videos he posted on YouTube, we know he has a severe distrust of the government, a fascination with the gold standard, and an obsession with currencies, new languages, and grammar.

Are we to believe, as some have claimed, that Loughner was so disgruntled about Giffords' failure to adequately answer the "what is government" question that he decided to try and assassinate her? Was his passion for the gold standard so strong that it drove him to murder, that he thought Giffords was an inadequate leader because she hadn't created her own language, or that his plot to kill the Arizona Democrat was retribution for her not electing him as her campaign treasurer, where he would be in charge of creating a new currency?

Maybe.

Or maybe Loughner had a girlfriend in the Farmtown game on Facebook who dumped him because his land wasn't well kept, and in a fit of rage he took a semi-automatic pistol to a political event. Maybe he read a violent comic book or played violent video games. Maybe he wasn't breastfed as a baby. Maybe he didn't eat his Wheaties. These aren't the actual hypotheses the media have concocted to fill news pages and clog up the airwaves, but they're just as useful in understanding Loughner's motive.

The truth is, we still know almost nothing about his real motivations, and the media's continuous attempts to make sense of his gibberish have become vexing.

I'm not one to delve too deeply into conspiracies theories (mainly because any good conspiracy is unprovable and therefore a gargantuan waste of time), but as the media begin their second week of continuous coverage of this tragedy, my hopes for an explanation – other than insanity – are dwindling.

It's entirely possible that nothing will ever be revealed that adequately explains this tragedy, that there will never be closure for the families who lost loved ones and the victims who are left wondering, "Why me?"

Such an unsatisfying and unresolved ending to the Tucson tragedy wouldn't be unprecedented. The many unanswered questions surrounding the assassination of JFK, the Oklahoma City bombing, and 9/11 – even Roswell, the alleged plot to kill Princess Diana, and the moon landing "hoax" – continue to plague many Americans who struggle with the frustration of the unknown with every anniversary.

It's unlikely that even Loughner himself could provide us with a satisfying answer to the nonsensical question he posed to Giffords, or to the shooting itself. In tragedy, there is no satisfaction.

But it would be better than nothing, which is what we have now.
 
(Cross-posted from Muddy Politics.)

Saturday, January 8, 2011

The rush to judgment in Arizona?


The narrative has already taken hold -- due to the lightning speed of the Internet, Twitter, Facebook, and non-stop cable coverage with opinions spouted from so-called journalists -- the sides are already set on the causes of the incident in Tucson.  From the perspective of the nation's political psyche -- there are some similarities to the rush to judgment on 11/22/63 -- the day we lost a president, our innocence, and belief in leadership. Are we rushing to judgment on 1/8/11?

We did lose six people today -- and another notch in the beltway tightens around the leaders of the country. As for innocence -- no matter what the shooter's motivations were (random act, voices in his head, political message, attention, etc.) -- the political process of this country again is forever changed, and changed away from being the open democracy (did we even have one?) the documents of the 1700s set out to pursue.

The shooting of Rep. Giffords is a tipping point -- and, yes, both sides are going to take every opportunity to politicize this to their advantage, without any proof of motivation from Loughner or from his alleged companion, the speculation will become the narrative. Whichever side (wanna take a bet on which side it is?) is more persuasive in arguing its case, that will end up being the truth in bizarro America. 

I will go with the statement from Sheriff Dupnik of Pima County, a man on the front line:

When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous. And, unfortunately, Arizona I think has become sort of the Capital. We have become the Mecca for prejudice and bigotry.

How fast before the right labels him a "liberal sheriff"?

Should we rush to judgment on the cause of Loughner's action? Of course not. Even I am guilty of that. What is very apparent to any sane person is the amount of vitriol coming from supposed leaders and people who can influence the narrative is really poisoning this country. Even if this is a "lone nut" (apparently the sheriff says they are looking for a white man in his 50s, a companion to Loughner), the hate speech that comes from the right in the form of Beck, Limbaugh, Palin, and Bachmann ("armed and loaded") can easily tip over a "lone nut." Can anyone name one person on the left that espouses the same violent rhetoric as Beck or Palin? If it it sounds like I am contracting myself -- about rushing to judgment -- I am. This country needs to carefully examine the limits of crying fire in a crowded theater, even if there is NO direct relationship between today's horrific incident and Palin's crosshairs.

The headlines on the talk shows tomorrow -- "everyone does it." The spin on this will make Linda Blair's head from The Exorcist (which was on today) look like a slow walk in the park. Any references to hate speech from the likes of Beck and Palin will of course be whitewashed by the media, as they direct all thinking towards the "lone nut."

There will be no learning from this experience, no examination of how or why it happened, only ways to prevent it from happening. Hopefully Giffords does recover, though six others for sure will not. The sad part is that America will probably never recover. If we thought in 2011 America that Congressmen were removed from their constituents now, well, wait till you see what the connection will be post-Tucson. NONE of them will be allowed to have these open forums or public gatherings, and they will become more and more isolated and more and more removed from common folks. This will mean they are more and more vulnerable to the influence of those than can get to them -- lobbyists, for example.

This is a watershed day in American politics, but sadly the media will spin it away from America looking at itself and into the "lone nut" theory. Call it the Warren Commission redux: much easier to blame one lunatic than examine society as a whole.

We have a lethal cocktail running around this country, a cocktail combining the lack of adequate care for the mentally ill with Constitutional protection of "First Amendment" hate speech from Beck and Palin and "second amendment" remedies, tossed in with weakened gun laws. And this concoction is a recipe for total disaster. If we don't examine and admit this is more than a "lone nut," this will be just become more cancerous. We know the NRA will somehow spin away the fact that a mentally ill person can carry a concealed weapon to a political rally or that the rhetoric from people like Palin actually encourages more violence. Are we willing to let that go on because it is too painful or too politically difficult to talk about? You betcha.

None of this will be talked about by politicians or the media.

P.S.: Of all the sights and sounds on the tube today, NONE was more disgusting than watching Jan Brewer, who as governor has drastically axed medical coverage in Arizona, to the point of denying transplants, AND encouraged hatred to be the norm in her state with the passage of the draconian immigration bill, shed those crocodile tears. As sure as anything, she will be portrayed her as the caring governor. I refer the good governor to Sheriff Dupnik: "vitriol might be free speech, but it's not without consequences."

Arizona killing: Thoughts on the Gabrielle Giffords assassination attempt


UPDATED.

I was out and about this afternoon when I heard a brief report on a local radio station about a shooting in Arizona.

My first thought: Great, another shooting in the U.S. Another sad story from a violent, gun-crazy country.

I pulled out my BlackBerry and quickly discovered what had happened -- and who the target was.

My second thought: Well, we sort of knew this was coming, right, this sort of political violence, likely by someone steeped in right-wing ideology? It was only a matter of time.

This is when Twitter is such a useful tool, and I used it gather as much information as I could from the many reliable sources I follow.

My third thought: Okay, we don't yet know all the details, and we do need to be careful not to jump to conclusions, but the circumstantial evidence is already piling up.

Giffords is an enemy of the Tea Party. She narrowly beat a Tea Party GOP opponent in November. She's a Blue Dog, a moderate Democrat, but she voted for health-care reform and supported DADT repeal. She's apparently extremely well-liked.

But her office had been vandalized and there are reports she had to cancel a recent event because of the threat of right-wing violence.

Sarah Palin and others had targeted her specifically, using the rhetoric of violence in their campaign literature and propaganda. Palin specifically had put her "in the crosshairs."

Yes, it was only a matter of time that something like this was going to happen.

I retweeted a great deal and tweeted a great deal of my own this afternoon. You can find all that, should you be interested, @mjwstickings.

My fourth thought: Perhaps this will be a turning point, a tipping point. Perhaps now the media and others will start paying attention to the rhetoric of violence that animates American conservatism today. You don't have to go far to find it. Just listen to the Tea Party, to Beck, to Palin. They need to be held accountable.

To be fair, not all conservatives are like this, even if so many of them either partake of it in some way or at the very least enable it by not speaking out against it.

Boehner, Bachmann, McCain -- these three and others quickly condemned the shooting, and I suppose I take them at their word, even if their hands are not entirely clean, particularly Bachmann's, who is the spinner of many a right-wing conspiracy theory, among other craziness.

(Update: Not surprisingly, Fox News is protecting Palin.

(Update 2: Remarkably, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik provided some much-needed perspective, pointing the blame in the right direction: "When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on this country is getting to be outrageous and unfortunately Arizona has become sort of the capital. We have become the Mecca for prejudice and bigotry.")

My fifth thought: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. As Rachel Maddow tweeted: "There is nothing to be gained from speculating on the motives and affiliations of AZ shooter w/o facts."

True, but, again, the evidence is piling up. See the many tweets I retweeted, including:
-- Digby: "The shooter sounds nuts, but he also sounds like he's influenced by fringy wingnut politics.

-- Peter Daou: "A shooter like this may be mentally ill, but that doesn't mean a stream of rightwing hate has no effect."

And a thought throughout: How horrible.

In all, so far, the shooting left six dead the 12 wounded. The dead include a federal judge (John Roll, who has faced right-wing threats before), a Giffords staffer, and a nine-year-old girl.

Yes, a child.

**********

The shooting took place outside a Safeway grocery store in Tucson, Arizona, where Giffords was holding a constituency meeting.

The killer is Jared Lee Loughner. He is in custody.

Giffords was shot once in the head. She made it through surgery and is in critical condition. Doctors are "optimistic" about her chances for recovery.

**********

As FDL's Jane Hamsher reports, Giffords's Tea Party opponent, Jesse Kelly, held an event in June described as such: "Get on Target for Victory in November Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office Shoot a fully automatic M15 with Jesse Kelly."

As Politico's Ben Smith reports, Loughner "left social media hints," including a YouTube clip:

The police have named a suspect in the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, Jared Loughner. A person under that name has a YouTube account that includes suggestions of anti-government political views.

"You don't have to accept the federalist laws," the video above says; It also insists on the gold and silver standard, talks of revolution, and suggests that the government is imposing "mind control and brainwash on the people by controlling grammar."

His linked MySpace page, no longer available, included statements about the gold standard and about SWAT teams paying for their equipment with illegal currency.

Among his long list of favorite books in his YouTube profile are Mein Kampf, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha.

Loughner also "favorited" just one video on YouTube, which shows the burning of an American flag and is accompanied by an anti-government screed.

No, this isn't just pure Republican extremism, and so I think it's wrong to label him so simply. If this is indeed Loughner, he's an anti-government wacko who is generally on the far right but who is obviously outside of the broad political spectrum of establishment politics.

So, again, we shouldn't get ahead of ourselves. But it's pretty easy to see how the rhetoric of the right, including of the Tea Party and Republican Party right, could have had a great deal of influence on him.

Again, just listen to Beck, listen to the Teabaggers, listen even to Palin and Bachmann, among many others. They may all claim to by hyper-patriotic, but they're all deeply anti-government and especially anti-Washington.

Palin has called the shooting a "tragedy," and of course she's right, but she needs to be held to account for what she has done.

And what is that? FDL's TBogg quotes Palin herself:

Commonsense Conservatives & lovers of America: “Don’t Retreat, Instead – RELOAD!” Pls see my Facebook page.

And also the right-wing Townhall.com (bolding the key parts):

Twenty House Dems from districts that McCain carried in 2008 voted for the health care bill, and Sarah Palin has a target on every single one.

The targets were released on the six month anniversary of Obamacare, and include a lot of familiar names such as John Boccieri (OH), Chris Carney (P N) Gabrielle Giffords (AZ) and Ann Kirpatrick (AZ). The site invites donations, social networking, and the unbeatable Sarah love that has led to a 26:11 win/loss record of candidates in GOP primaries. Granted, some of those were in safe districts, but she’s also pulled off massive upsets that probably outshadow her less successful picks.

Regardless, this site should go a long way towards knocking off the politicians who put their party affiliation ahead of their constituent’s demands. It was announced via a tweet from SarahPalinUSA: "Lies, Damned Lies – Obamacare 6 Months Later; It’s Time to Take Back the 20!"

Here's Palin's map:



Seriously, is it any wonder this has happened?

**********

I'll conclude this post with a comment from Andrew Sullivan:

Giffords was one of twenty members of Congress placed within metaphorical "gun-sights" in SarahPac's graphic. That is not the same thing as placing a gun-sight over someone's face or person. No one can possibly believe -- or should -- that Sarah Palin is anything but horrified by what has taken place. But it remains the kind of rhetorical excess which was warned about at the time, and which loners can use to dreadful purposes. 

We'll have more on this, so stay tuned.

Some info on the Arizona shooter


Some links I received from a friend.

BREAKING: Arizona congresswoman shot


A congresswoman from Arizona was shot on Saturday along with several others during at public event at a grocery store in Tuscon, according to her spokesman, C.J. Karamargin. The Tucson Citizen reported that Ms. Giffords had been shot at close range in the head.

The condition of the congresswoman, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, a Democrat, remained unclear. She was taken to University Medical Center in Tucson, the trauma center for the area, about 10 miles away.

CNN quoted a public information officer as saying that 12 people had been injured in all.

What The New York Times has so far.